OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS vs HUSMAN'S
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS: 4
vs
HUSMAN'S: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | HUSMAN'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 607 cal | |
| Protein | 50 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 42.9 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | HUSMAN'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | HUSMAN'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 3,429 MG | 1,071 MG |