OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT-BAKED COOKIES vs DOUBLE CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED PROTEIN COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DOUBLE CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED PROTEIN COOKIES wins in 9 out of 11 nutrient categories
OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT-BAKED COOKIES: 0
vs
DOUBLE CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED PROTEIN COOKIES: 9
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT-BAKED COOKIES | DOUBLE CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED PROTEIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 368 cal | |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 14.0 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 47.4 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 12.3 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 8.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT-BAKED COOKIES | DOUBLE CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED PROTEIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT-BAKED COOKIES | DOUBLE CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED PROTEIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 32 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 3.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 48 MG | 309 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 333 MG | 386 MG |