OATMEAL RAISIN OLD FASHIONED SOFT COOKIES vs FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OATMEAL RAISIN OLD FASHIONED SOFT COOKIES wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
OATMEAL RAISIN OLD FASHIONED SOFT COOKIES: 4
vs
FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OATMEAL RAISIN OLD FASHIONED SOFT COOKIES | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 478 cal | |
| Protein | 4 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 72 g | 69.6 g | |
| Fat | 12 g | 21.7 g | |
| Fiber | 4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OATMEAL RAISIN OLD FASHIONED SOFT COOKIES | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OATMEAL RAISIN OLD FASHIONED SOFT COOKIES | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 3.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 340 MG | 326 MG |