OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES: 6
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 455 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 72.7 g | 60.7 g | |
| Fat | 15.9 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 432 MG | 161 MG |