NO SALT ADDED WILD ALBACORE WHITE TUNA vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
NO SALT ADDED WILD ALBACORE WHITE TUNA: 2
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NO SALT ADDED WILD ALBACORE WHITE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NO SALT ADDED WILD ALBACORE WHITE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NO SALT ADDED WILD ALBACORE WHITE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 321 MG |