NO SALT ADDED WHOLE ROASTED CHICKEN vs GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
NO SALT ADDED WHOLE ROASTED CHICKEN: 3
vs
GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NO SALT ADDED WHOLE ROASTED CHICKEN | GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 224 cal | |
| Protein | 28.6 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 9.4 g | |
| Fat | 22.6 g | 11.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NO SALT ADDED WHOLE ROASTED CHICKEN | GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 7.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NO SALT ADDED WHOLE ROASTED CHICKEN | GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 12 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 286 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 107 MG | 282 MG |