NO BRAND vs CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NO BRAND wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NO BRAND: 5
vs
CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NO BRAND | CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 21.4 g | 5 g | |
| Fat | 8.8 g | 14 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NO BRAND | CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 30.2 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NO BRAND | CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 13 MG | 150 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 245 MG | 480 MG |