NIMAN RANCH vs UNCURED CAJUN-STYLE BACON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NIMAN RANCH wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
NIMAN RANCH: 5
vs
UNCURED CAJUN-STYLE BACON: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NIMAN RANCH | UNCURED CAJUN-STYLE BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 298 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 14.0 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NIMAN RANCH | UNCURED CAJUN-STYLE BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NIMAN RANCH | UNCURED CAJUN-STYLE BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 7 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 267 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 614 MG | 1,400 MG |