NATURAL GROUND BISON vs 100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
NATURAL GROUND BISON: 2
vs
100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL GROUND BISON | 100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 168 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 18.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 9.7 g | 18.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL GROUND BISON | 100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL GROUND BISON | 100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 53 MG | 62 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 4.7 MG |