NATURAL DRESSING vs SWEET ASIAN CITRUS DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET ASIAN CITRUS DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL DRESSING: 2
vs
SWEET ASIAN CITRUS DRESSING: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL DRESSING | SWEET ASIAN CITRUS DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL DRESSING | SWEET ASIAN CITRUS DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 12 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL DRESSING | SWEET ASIAN CITRUS DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 571 MG | 1,500 MG |