NATURAL DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL DRESSING: 3
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 36.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 571 MG | 533 MG |