NATURAL DECADENCE vs HARRIS TEETER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARRIS TEETER wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL DECADENCE: 4
vs
HARRIS TEETER: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL DECADENCE | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 26.3 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 7.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL DECADENCE | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 2.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL DECADENCE | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 70 MG | 44 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 105 MG | 378 MG |