NATURAL DECADENCE vs GOOD MEADOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL DECADENCE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL DECADENCE: 5
vs
GOOD MEADOW: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL DECADENCE | GOOD MEADOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 395 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 2.6 g | |
| Carbs | 26.3 g | 59.2 g | |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 17.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL DECADENCE | GOOD MEADOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL DECADENCE | GOOD MEADOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 70 MG | 79 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 105 MG | 316 MG |