NATURAL DECADENCE vs NABISCO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NABISCO wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
NATURAL DECADENCE: 3
vs
NABISCO: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL DECADENCE | NABISCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 458 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 4.2 g | |
| Carbs | 71.4 g | 79.2 g | |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 10.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL DECADENCE | NABISCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL DECADENCE | NABISCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 104 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 232 MG | 354 MG |