NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS vs MAPLE APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS: 3
vs
MAPLE APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS | MAPLE APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 303 cal | 165 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 2.0 g | 5.9 g | |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS | MAPLE APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 11.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS | MAPLE APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 899 MG | 706 MG |