NATURAL CASING FRANKFORTS vs BUFFALO STYLE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUFFALO STYLE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL CASING FRANKFORTS: 2
vs
BUFFALO STYLE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL CASING FRANKFORTS | BUFFALO STYLE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 129 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 15.3 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 8.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL CASING FRANKFORTS | BUFFALO STYLE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL CASING FRANKFORTS | BUFFALO STYLE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,161 MG | 694 MG |