NATURAL ALMONDS vs DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA wins in 1 out of 11 nutrient categories
NATURAL ALMONDS: 0
vs
DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA: 1
(10 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL ALMONDS | DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 567 cal | 567 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 20 g | 20 g | Tie |
| Fat | 50 g | 50 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 13.3 g | 13.3 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL ALMONDS | DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL ALMONDS | DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 267 MG | 267 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 4.8 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 733 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |