NASSAU CANDY vs RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NASSAU CANDY wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
NASSAU CANDY: 4
vs
RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NASSAU CANDY | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 500 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 5 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 70 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NASSAU CANDY | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NASSAU CANDY | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 100 MG | Tie |