NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS vs PLANT BASED DUSTED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS: 5
vs
PLANT BASED DUSTED SHRIMP: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | PLANT BASED DUSTED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 98 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 20.2 g | 23.9 g | |
| Fat | 11.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | PLANT BASED DUSTED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 167 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 643 MG | 1,348 MG |