NANTASKET vs MARSHMALLOW DIPPED SPOONS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NANTASKET wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
NANTASKET: 3
vs
MARSHMALLOW DIPPED SPOONS: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NANTASKET | MARSHMALLOW DIPPED SPOONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 455 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 85 g | 72.7 g | |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 13.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NANTASKET | MARSHMALLOW DIPPED SPOONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NANTASKET | MARSHMALLOW DIPPED SPOONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 6.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 162 MG | 91 MG |