NABISCO vs BACK TO NATURE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NABISCO wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
NABISCO: 5
vs
BACK TO NATURE: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NABISCO | BACK TO NATURE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 458 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 79.2 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 10.4 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NABISCO | BACK TO NATURE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NABISCO | BACK TO NATURE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 104 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 354 MG | 383 MG |