NABISCO vs MRS. FIELDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MRS. FIELDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
NABISCO: 3
vs
MRS. FIELDS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NABISCO | MRS. FIELDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 441 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 5.9 g | |
| Carbs | 63.3 g | 64.7 g | |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 17.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NABISCO | MRS. FIELDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NABISCO | MRS. FIELDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 59 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 333 MG | 382 MG |