NAANWICH CHICKEN VINDALOO vs BACON WRAPPED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON WRAPPED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NAANWICH CHICKEN VINDALOO: 3
vs
BACON WRAPPED SHRIMP: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NAANWICH CHICKEN VINDALOO | BACON WRAPPED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 165 cal | |
| Protein | 11.6 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 8.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NAANWICH CHICKEN VINDALOO | BACON WRAPPED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NAANWICH CHICKEN VINDALOO | BACON WRAPPED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 395 MG | 1,176 MG |