MUSHROOM AND SWISS BEEF CAVATAPPI WITH BACON AND GREEN ONIONS vs CHINESE STYLE BBQ PORK WITH FRIED RICE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHINESE STYLE BBQ PORK WITH FRIED RICE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MUSHROOM AND SWISS BEEF CAVATAPPI WITH BACON AND GREEN ONIONS: 4
vs
CHINESE STYLE BBQ PORK WITH FRIED RICE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MUSHROOM AND SWISS BEEF CAVATAPPI WITH BACON AND GREEN ONIONS | CHINESE STYLE BBQ PORK WITH FRIED RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 163 cal | 145 cal | |
| Protein | 10.9 g | 5.5 g | |
| Carbs | 10.9 g | 24.8 g | |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 2.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0.7 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MUSHROOM AND SWISS BEEF CAVATAPPI WITH BACON AND GREEN ONIONS | CHINESE STYLE BBQ PORK WITH FRIED RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 8.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MUSHROOM AND SWISS BEEF CAVATAPPI WITH BACON AND GREEN ONIONS | CHINESE STYLE BBQ PORK WITH FRIED RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 60 MG | 28 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 216 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 267 MG | 586 MG |