MRS. RICHARDSON'S vs SABLE & ROSENFELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
MRS. RICHARDSON'S: 3
vs
SABLE & ROSENFELD: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MRS. RICHARDSON'S | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 325 cal | 120 cal | |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 72.5 g | 40 g | |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MRS. RICHARDSON'S | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MRS. RICHARDSON'S | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 162 MG | 0 MG |