MRS FIELDS vs LANCASTER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MRS FIELDS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MRS FIELDS: 5
vs
LANCASTER: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MRS FIELDS | LANCASTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 452 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 42.9 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MRS FIELDS | LANCASTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MRS FIELDS | LANCASTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 95 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 333 MG |