MRS. FIELDS vs RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MRS. FIELDS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MRS. FIELDS: 5
vs
RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MRS. FIELDS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 405 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 67.6 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 13.5 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MRS. FIELDS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MRS. FIELDS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 54 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 81 MG | 100 MG |