MRS. FIELDS vs MARSHMALLOW TOPPERS CHOCOLATEY COATING WITH RED DRIZZLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MRS. FIELDS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MRS. FIELDS: 5
vs
MARSHMALLOW TOPPERS CHOCOLATEY COATING WITH RED DRIZZLE: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MRS. FIELDS | MARSHMALLOW TOPPERS CHOCOLATEY COATING WITH RED DRIZZLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 395 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 65.8 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 15.8 g | 125 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MRS. FIELDS | MARSHMALLOW TOPPERS CHOCOLATEY COATING WITH RED DRIZZLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MRS. FIELDS | MARSHMALLOW TOPPERS CHOCOLATEY COATING WITH RED DRIZZLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 105 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 118 MG | 18 MG |