MONTEBELLO KITCHENS vs FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MONTEBELLO KITCHENS: 3
vs
FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MONTEBELLO KITCHENS | FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 130 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 30 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MONTEBELLO KITCHENS | FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MONTEBELLO KITCHENS | FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 117 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 297 MG | 767 MG |