MONSTER MERCANTILE vs CHICK-O-STICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MONSTER MERCANTILE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
MONSTER MERCANTILE: 3
vs
CHICK-O-STICK: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MONSTER MERCANTILE | CHICK-O-STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 295 cal | 444 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 5.6 g | |
| Carbs | 71.4 g | 77.8 g | |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 11.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MONSTER MERCANTILE | CHICK-O-STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MONSTER MERCANTILE | CHICK-O-STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 57 MG | 278 MG |