MIRIN SWEET COOKING RICE WINE vs VINTAGE COOKING WHITE WINE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
VINTAGE COOKING WHITE WINE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
MIRIN SWEET COOKING RICE WINE: 2
vs
VINTAGE COOKING WHITE WINE: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MIRIN SWEET COOKING RICE WINE | VINTAGE COOKING WHITE WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 150 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 30 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MIRIN SWEET COOKING RICE WINE | VINTAGE COOKING WHITE WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 600 MG |