MINI COOKIES vs FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MINI COOKIES: 2
vs
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MINI COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 69.0 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MINI COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MINI COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 3.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 161 MG | 172 MG |