MINI BLOOD SUCKERS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
MINI BLOOD SUCKERS: 0
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MINI BLOOD SUCKERS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 375 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 100 g | 95 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MINI BLOOD SUCKERS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MINI BLOOD SUCKERS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 75 MG |