MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE COVERED ALMONDS vs KINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE COVERED ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE COVERED ALMONDS: 6
vs
KINGS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE COVERED ALMONDS | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 23.3 g | |
| Carbs | 42.9 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fat | 39.3 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 17.9 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE COVERED ALMONDS | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE STYLE COVERED ALMONDS | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 179 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 536 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |