MILK CHOCOLATE MARSHMALLOWS vs TORN & GLASSER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TORN & GLASSER wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE MARSHMALLOWS: 2
vs
TORN & GLASSER: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE MARSHMALLOWS | TORN & GLASSER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 75 g | 72.5 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE MARSHMALLOWS | TORN & GLASSER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE MARSHMALLOWS | TORN & GLASSER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 10.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 542 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 25 MG |