MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED WHOLE ALMONDS vs SHAKESPEARE'S CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED WHOLE ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED WHOLE ALMONDS: 5
vs
SHAKESPEARE'S CHOCOLATE: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED WHOLE ALMONDS | SHAKESPEARE'S CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 504 cal | |
| Protein | 9.5 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 45.2 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 38.1 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED WHOLE ALMONDS | SHAKESPEARE'S CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED WHOLE ALMONDS | SHAKESPEARE'S CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 214 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 490 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 60 MG | 600 MG |