MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR vs CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR: 5
vs
CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR | CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 511 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 70 g | 65 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 28 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR | CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR | CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 90 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 233 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 233 MG | 58 MG |