MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR vs CHOCOLATE ROSE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR: 6
vs
CHOCOLATE ROSE: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR | CHOCOLATE ROSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 5.6 g | |
| Carbs | 70 g | 61.1 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 27.8 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR | CHOCOLATE ROSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STAR | CHOCOLATE ROSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 167 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 233 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 233 MG | 78 MG |