MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS vs HAMPTON FARMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HAMPTON FARMS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 3
vs
HAMPTON FARMS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | HAMPTON FARMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 525 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 25 g | |
| Fat | 35 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | HAMPTON FARMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | HAMPTON FARMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 150 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 464 MG |