MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE vs PRE-CUT BABY BACK PORK RIBS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PRE-CUT BABY BACK PORK RIBS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE: 4
vs
PRE-CUT BABY BACK PORK RIBS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE | PRE-CUT BABY BACK PORK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 91 cal | 412 cal | |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 38.8 g | |
| Carbs | 6.1 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 3.0 g | 27.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE | PRE-CUT BABY BACK PORK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE | PRE-CUT BABY BACK PORK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 258 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 273 MG | 424 MG |