MILD ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE vs CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILD ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MILD ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 5
vs
CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILD ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE | CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 114 cal | 306 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 15.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fat | 4.3 g | 24.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILD ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE | CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILD ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE | CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 229 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 729 MG | 11,060 MG |