MICHIGAN CHERRY FRUIT FILLING vs APPLE BAGPAC
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MICHIGAN CHERRY FRUIT FILLING wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
MICHIGAN CHERRY FRUIT FILLING: 2
vs
APPLE BAGPAC: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MICHIGAN CHERRY FRUIT FILLING | APPLE BAGPAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 cal | 152 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 35.3 g | 39.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MICHIGAN CHERRY FRUIT FILLING | APPLE BAGPAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MICHIGAN CHERRY FRUIT FILLING | APPLE BAGPAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 35 MG | 106 MG |