MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE vs TROPICAL CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE: 4
vs
TROPICAL CANDY: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | TROPICAL CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 438 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 76.2 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | TROPICAL CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | TROPICAL CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 250 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 4.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 0 MG |