MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE vs THE ORIGINAL COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THE ORIGINAL COOKIES wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE: 2
vs
THE ORIGINAL COOKIES: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | THE ORIGINAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 76.2 g | 67.7 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 26.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | THE ORIGINAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | THE ORIGINAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 191 MG |