MARSHMALLOW CHICKS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 3
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 324 cal | 350 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.5 g | |
| Carbs | 82.4 g | 87.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 50 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 75 MG |