MARSHMALLOW CHICKS vs DARK CHOCOLATE BARK WITH CALIFORNIA ALMONDS & SEA SALT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DARK CHOCOLATE BARK WITH CALIFORNIA ALMONDS & SEA SALT wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 2
vs
DARK CHOCOLATE BARK WITH CALIFORNIA ALMONDS & SEA SALT: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | DARK CHOCOLATE BARK WITH CALIFORNIA ALMONDS & SEA SALT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 85.7 g | 54.8 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | DARK CHOCOLATE BARK WITH CALIFORNIA ALMONDS & SEA SALT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | DARK CHOCOLATE BARK WITH CALIFORNIA ALMONDS & SEA SALT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 95 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 6.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 202 MG |