MARSHMALLOW vs CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CANDY COATING ALMOND BARK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW: 5
vs
CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CANDY COATING ALMOND BARK: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW | CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CANDY COATING ALMOND BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 405 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 64.9 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 13.5 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW | CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CANDY COATING ALMOND BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW | CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CANDY COATING ALMOND BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 108 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 176 MG | 0 MG |