MARSALA VINTAGE COOKING WINE vs PROGRESSO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PROGRESSO wins in 3 out of 7 nutrient categories
MARSALA VINTAGE COOKING WINE: 2
vs
PROGRESSO: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSALA VINTAGE COOKING WINE | PROGRESSO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 150 cal | 56 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.6 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 3.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 4.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSALA VINTAGE COOKING WINE | PROGRESSO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 600 MG | 349 MG |