MARSALA VINTAGE COOKING WINE vs HAM GLAZE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSALA VINTAGE COOKING WINE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
MARSALA VINTAGE COOKING WINE: 3
vs
HAM GLAZE: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSALA VINTAGE COOKING WINE | HAM GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 150 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 40 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSALA VINTAGE COOKING WINE | HAM GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSALA VINTAGE COOKING WINE | HAM GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 600 MG | 0 MG |