MARCO POLO RUSK TOAST vs THE ESSENTIAL BAKING COMPANY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THE ESSENTIAL BAKING COMPANY wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
MARCO POLO RUSK TOAST: 2
vs
THE ESSENTIAL BAKING COMPANY: 5
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARCO POLO RUSK TOAST | THE ESSENTIAL BAKING COMPANY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 387 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 6.1 g | |
| Carbs | 74.2 g | 36.4 g | |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 18.2 g | |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 6.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARCO POLO RUSK TOAST | THE ESSENTIAL BAKING COMPANY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARCO POLO RUSK TOAST | THE ESSENTIAL BAKING COMPANY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 16 MG | 273 MG |